Skip to content
PROTOTYPE — MOCK DATAFigures are generated fixtures derived from the registry. Not ACF actuals.
Menu (13)
?
Vu Tuan Minh (CEO)
exec · read-only
Layers
L1, L2, L3
Scope
ACF and below
Packs in scope
13 of 13
Employee record
— a role, not a person

Clears the persona and returns you to the default reader. At fullstack this is Entra ID (A-21) and the identity stops being a cookie.

← Company BSC
PERSPECTIVE · CALCULATED FROM 20 METRICS IN YOUR SCOPE

Customer

Weighted 25% of the company scorecard. That weight is Ikigai’s reading of Decision 184/2023 applied at company level (T-01); Q-24 asks whether it is board-approved or ours. The arithmetic below re-runs unchanged when ACF sets the real weights.

HOW THIS NUMBER IS CALCULATED
113
COMPANY CARD SCORE
1 of 5 named metrics
113
ACROSS THE WHOLE REGISTRY
1 of 20 metrics

Both are the unweighted mean of whatever can be scored A-30, Ikigai’s formula, not ACF’s. Neither is weighted by priority band: a band decides where attention goes in the simulator, and letting it move the score too would mean the number changed when nothing measured changed.

20
IN THE REGISTRY
1
SCORABLE — 5%
19
CANNOT CONTRIBUTE
5
ON THE COMPANY CARD
9% OF THIS PERSPECTIVE'S ATTENTION CAN ACTUALLY BE SPENT

The 25% this perspective carries is split among its members by priority band (13 §A.3). Of that, 91% sits on metrics that cannot be scored at all — so no weighting, however it is set, can reach it. That is the single number that explains why the strategy simulator barely moves.

THE CERTIFICATION QUEUE, IN PRIORITY ORDER
  • P2AP-02Approval ratioNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2CO-01Resolved rate by bucketNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2CO-09Conduct / complaint rateZero target — a ratio score against zero is undefined (Q-34)
  • P2NS-01POS activation rateNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2PD-04Insurance attachment rateNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P3CG-10Data-subject / consent exceptionsZero target — a ratio score against zero is undefined (Q-34)
EVERY CUSTOMER METRIC IN YOUR SCOPE — HIGHEST PRIORITY FIRST
METRICPRIORITYSHARESTATEVALUE VS TARGETSCORECONTRIBUTES?
Approval ratioON THE COMPANY CARD
AP-02 · Appraisal / Underwriting · KPI · LAG
P29.1%
No targetMANAGED
55.2% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Resolved rate by bucketON THE COMPANY CARD
CO-01 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KPI · LAG
P29.1%
No targetMANUAL
103.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Conduct / complaint rate
CO-09 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KRI · LEAD
P29.1%
Off targetMANUAL
29.4% vs 0.0%Zero target — a ratio score against zero is undefined (Q-34)
POS activation rateON THE COMPANY CARD
NS-01 · National Sales Network · KPI · LEAD
P29.1%
No targetMANUAL
33.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Insurance attachment rateON THE COMPANY CARD
PD-04 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LAG
P29.1%
No targetMANUAL
61.6% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Consent rateON THE COMPANY CARD
TS-03 · Telesales · KPI · LEAD
P29.1%
On targetMANUAL
4.5% vs 4.0%113✓ in the mean
Data-subject / consent exceptions
CG-10 · Corporate Governance · KRI · LEAD
P36.8%
On targetMANUAL
4,433.3 vs 0Zero target — a ratio score against zero is undefined (Q-34)
Collection conduct / complaint rate
CG-09 · Corporate Governance · KRI · LEAD
P44.5%
No targetMANUAL
48.0% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Refusal rate
TS-04 · Telesales · GUARD · LEAD
P44.5%
No targetMANAGED
34.0% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Lead → application conversion
TS-05 · Telesales · KPI · LEAD
P44.5%
No targetMANAGED
1.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Application → disbursement conversion
TS-06 · Telesales · KPI · LAG
P44.5%
No targetMANAGED
73.0% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Active partner count by tier
BM-06 · Business Management · KPI · LEAD
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
339.8 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Roll-back / cure rate
CO-03 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KPI · LAG
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
6.4% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
PTP kept rate
CO-07 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KPI · LEAD
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
58.5% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Active POS count
NS-02 · National Sales Network · KPI · LEAD
P52.3%
StaleMANUAL
587.4 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Region variance in activation
NS-07 · National Sales Network · KPI · LEAD
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
29.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Disbursements per day
OP-03 · Operations Department · KPI · LAG
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
154.4 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
eSign completion rate
OP-05 · Operations Department · KPI · LEAD
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
5.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Customer complaint resolution TAT
OP-12 · Operations Department · KPI · LAG
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
81.8 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Insurance conduct indicator
PD-08 · Product Development & Marketing · KRI · LEAD
P52.3%
No targetMANUAL
5.7 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one

19 of 20 cannot contribute to the score above. A perspective number computed from the rest is not wrong — it is narrower than it looks, and this table is the width of it.