Skip to content
PROTOTYPE — MOCK DATAFigures are generated fixtures derived from the registry. Not ACF actuals.
Menu (13)
?
Vu Tuan Minh (CEO)
exec · read-only
Layers
L1, L2, L3
Scope
ACF and below
Packs in scope
13 of 13
Employee record
— a role, not a person

Clears the persona and returns you to the default reader. At fullstack this is Entra ID (A-21) and the identity stops being a cookie.

FEEDBACK · THE LOOP THIS PRODUCT WAS BUILT ON

7 rounds, and what each one produced

Read from feedback/ in the repository. Every round became a numbered plan and a sprint, and every sprint recorded what was measured — including where the feedback turned out to be right for a different reason than the one given.

Round 7feedback-7.md
ASKED FOR
  • Main dashboard — a NEW module, nothing is deleted
  • Custom board — rename of the current Boards
  • Action item 2 — build it inside the Main dashboard
  • Action item 3 — the source file for the Main dashboard
  • Action items 4, 5 and 6 — check the same file
  • The organisation chart — December 2025
  • Things the file raises that need an answer
  • Plan
  • ⚠ Missing — the verbatim action items
Round 6feedback-6.md
ASKED FOR
  • Main content width in some screen deliver from feedback-5 not full width
  • Replace the bot icon to magic icon
  • Company BSC
  • Integration visualization
Round 5→ F17–F21
ASKED FOR
  • Nav bar
  • Financial, Customer, Internal Process, People and Learning
  • About the Integration
  • Fix the STRATEGY MAP — THE CAUSAL CLAIMS BENEATH THE SCORECARD
  • Fix Chart gallery not load
  • Bot icon
  • Important: New module Frault detection
  • Metric card UI look like AI
WHAT IT PRODUCED

The diagrams that had been rendering nothing, the tile redesign, help and profile, perspective drill-down, and the data-integrity module.

Round 4→ F12–F16
ASKED FOR
  • Metrics weight
  • The search metrics in nav bar
  • Monitoring and Campaign
  • Report
  • Setting
WHAT IT PRODUCED

Priority bands, global search, campaigns, reporting, RuBAC and the audit log. Priority made the simulator LESS responsive, not more, and the page says so.

Round 3→ F11
ASKED FOR
  • Strategy simulator enhance
  • AI
WHAT IT PRODUCED

The draggable weight studio and the explain assistant. Two of its twelve chart readings were wrong on the first run and were caught because they are checkable.

Round 2→ F10
ASKED FOR
  • Sticky/ Freeze
  • Board
WHAT IT PRODUCED

Boards with three starters, and the strategy simulator — which then reported that at any weighting 90% of the shortlist was identical.

Round 1→ F9
ASKED FOR
  • The AEON logo
  • The Side menu
  • Registry pagination
  • Variety of chart
WHAT IT PRODUCED

The shell: the logo centred, the nav and header frozen, the registry, and seven more chart shapes.

HOW TO GIVE THE NEXT ROUND

There is no form here, deliberately. A feedback box in a prototype posts into nothing, and a message that goes nowhere is worse than an honest absence. Feedback arrives as a markdown file in feedback/ — screenshots included — and that has worked for five rounds because it keeps the ask, the plan and the build in one repository where anyone can check whether the thing asked for is the thing delivered.

What each round became: what’s new → · the plans →