Resolved rate by bucketCO-01
Value 54.97 against threshold 70.
Which bucket is the book leaking from?
How much of this is measured: Resolved rates are published; the roll-FORWARD splits between them are derived as (100 − resolved) and are not separately reported. Cure (roll-back) is near zero late-stage, so the sankey shows it only where ACF reports it.
- Formula
- resolved POS ÷ bucket POS
- Unit / direction
- pct · higher better
- Source system
- Nexusti
- Refresh
- daily_t1
- Target
- per bucket TBC
- Target status
- PROPOSED BY IKIGAI (T-01)
- Baseline in context/
- B0 98.59% · B1 54.97% (below KPI) · B2 41.67% · B3 31.45% · B4 4.98%
Both proposed by Ikigai and awaiting ACF confirmation (DEC-02).
Head of Debt Collection Operations·IT System Development
A headline KPI is resolved with its guard, so the pairing cannot be forgotten by the UI.
- Head of Debt Collection Operationsperiod 2026-09 · 21 Sep 2026
B1 below KPI again. Root cause is coverage, not effort — 65,215 cases still have no assigned collector.
Commentary is attached to the metric and period, not to a slide. It survives the month — which is what makes a variance reviewable at the next meeting instead of re-argued. Prototype — read-only fixtures; at fullstack this is the COMMENT table with author identity from AD.