Skip to content
PROTOTYPE — MOCK DATAFigures are generated fixtures derived from the registry. Not ACF actuals.
Menu (13)
?
Vu Tuan Minh (CEO)
exec · read-only
Layers
L1, L2, L3
Scope
ACF and below
Packs in scope
13 of 13
Employee record
— a role, not a person

Clears the persona and returns you to the default reader. At fullstack this is Entra ID (A-21) and the identity stops being a cookie.

← Company BSC
PERSPECTIVE · CALCULATED FROM 32 METRICS IN YOUR SCOPE

Financial

Weighted 40% of the company scorecard. That weight is Ikigai’s reading of Decision 184/2023 applied at company level (T-01); Q-24 asks whether it is board-approved or ours. The arithmetic below re-runs unchanged when ACF sets the real weights.

HOW THIS NUMBER IS CALCULATED
98
COMPANY CARD SCORE
3 of 5 named metrics
the card lists 6 rows — 1 is an objective with no metric behind it
87
ACROSS THE WHOLE REGISTRY
5 of 32 metrics

Both are the unweighted mean of whatever can be scored A-30, Ikigai’s formula, not ACF’s. Neither is weighted by priority band: a band decides where attention goes in the simulator, and letting it move the score too would mean the number changed when nothing measured changed.

These two numbers differ, and only the left one is on the company scorecard. The BSC averages the 5 metrics the card names; the right-hand figure averages all 32 in the perspective. Neither is wrong; they answer different questions. Quoting one as the other is how an organisation ends up with two figures for the same thing.

32
IN THE REGISTRY
5
SCORABLE — 16%
27
CANNOT CONTRIBUTE
7
ON THE COMPANY CARD
29% OF THIS PERSPECTIVE'S ATTENTION CAN ACTUALLY BE SPENT

The 40% this perspective carries is split among its members by priority band (13 §A.3). Of that, 71% sits on metrics that cannot be scored at all — so no weighting, however it is set, can reach it. That is the single number that explains why the strategy simulator barely moves.

THE CERTIFICATION QUEUE, IN PRIORITY ORDER
  • P1CG-02NPL — Circular 31 basisNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2CG-04CARNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2FN-01PBT vs budgetNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2FN-03Net spreadNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2FN-10Forecast accuracyNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
  • P2PD-01Disbursement by schemeNo agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
EVERY FINANCIAL METRIC IN YOUR SCOPE — HIGHEST PRIORITY FIRST
METRICPRIORITYSHARESTATEVALUE VS TARGETSCORECONTRIBUTES?
NPL — Circular 31 basisREGON THE COMPANY CARD
CG-02 · Corporate Governance · KRI · LAG
P16.7%
No targetMANUAL
22.8% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Provision expense vs budgetHINGEON THE COMPANY CARD
CR-05 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · KPI · LAG
P16.7%
Off targetMANUAL
65.0% vs 100.0%65✓ in the mean
Gross NPL before write-off + write-off volume
CR-09 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · GUARD · LAG
P16.7%
Off targetMANUAL
28.4 vs 414✓ in the mean
Provision coverageREG
CG-03 · Corporate Governance · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
On targetMANUAL
40.4% vs 9.0%130✓ in the mean
CARREG
CG-04 · Corporate Governance · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
No targetMANUAL
21.5% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
PBT vs budgetON THE COMPANY CARD
FN-01 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
No targetMANUAL
30.6% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Operating revenue vs budgetON THE COMPANY CARD
FN-02 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
On targetMANUAL
107.4% vs 100.0%107✓ in the mean
Net spreadON THE COMPANY CARD
FN-03 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
No targetMANUAL
20.4% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Lending balance vs planON THE COMPANY CARD
FN-05 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
On targetMANUAL
121.3% vs 100.0%121✓ in the mean
Forecast accuracy
FN-10 · Finance & Accounting · GUARD · LAG
P25.3%
No dataUNMEASURED
vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Disbursement by schemeON THE COMPANY CARD
PD-01 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LAG
P25.3%
No targetMANUAL
72.6% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Risk-appetite threshold status
CR-11 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · KRI · LEAD
P34.0%
No targetMANUAL
37.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Budget-vs-actual by division
FN-07 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P34.0%
No targetMANUAL
609,931.5 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Capital adequacy headroom
FN-12 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P34.0%
No targetMANUAL
29.2% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Average ticket size
TS-07 · Telesales · KPI · LAG
P42.7%
No targetMANAGED
38.5 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Partner concentration
BM-03 · Business Management · KRI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
15.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Subsidy cost on 0% schemes
BM-04 · Business Management · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
4.3% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Recovery amount vs target
CO-04 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
1,587.6 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Cost to collect
CO-11 · Collections / Debt Recovery · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
55.9 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Vintage loss curves
CR-02 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · KPI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
31.8% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
NPL by product
CR-04 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
25.3% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Provision coverage
CR-06 · Credit Risk & Portfolio Management · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
66.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Cost-to-income ratio
FN-04 · Finance & Accounting · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
95.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Funding concentration
FN-11 · Finance & Accounting · KRI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
32.5% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Loss avoided vs loss incurred
FR-07 · Fraud Prevention & Investigation · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
17.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Disbursement per active POS
NS-03 · National Sales Network · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
1,486.8 vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Merchant concentration
NS-08 · National Sales Network · KRI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
14.2% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Yield by scheme
PD-02 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
30.6% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Standard-scheme mix
PD-03 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
38.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Insurance premium ratio
PD-05 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
4.3% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Scheme profitability
PD-06 · Product Development & Marketing · KPI · LAG
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
41.1% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one
Scheme concentration
PD-09 · Product Development & Marketing · KRI · LEAD
P51.3%
No targetMANUAL
50.7% vs No agreed target — there is nothing to be off until the metric owner sets one

27 of 32 cannot contribute to the score above. A perspective number computed from the rest is not wrong — it is narrower than it looks, and this table is the width of it.