Skip to content
PROTOTYPE — MOCK DATAFigures are generated fixtures derived from the registry. Not ACF actuals.
Menu (13)
LAYER 3 — DEPARTMENT KPI PACK

Business Management

8 metrics7 leading · 1 lagging8 manual8 without a target
Partner contract cycle time
BM-01
6,277.8
No target
MANUALmanual⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Planning

POS onboarding TAT
BM-02
3
No target
MANUALmanual⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Planning

Partner concentration
BM-03
15.1%
No target
MANUALPTSP (pre-build)⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Development

Subsidy cost on 0% schemes
BM-04
4.3%
No target
MANUALPTSP (pre-build)⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Development

Subsidy-to-rate conversion governance
BM-05
No data
MANUALexternal Excel○ NOT REPORTED

Head of Business Management·IT System Planning

Active partner count by tier
BM-06
339.8
No target
MANUALPTSP (pre-build)⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Development

Scheme coverage per POS
BM-07
1,959.8
No target
MANUALPTSP (pre-build)⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Development

Dealer exclusion / blacklist hits
BM-08
0.7
No target
MANUALPTSP (pre-build)⏱ T+1

Head of Business Management·IT System Development

LAYER 4 · NO ROSTER FOR THIS DEPARTMENT

Nobody in Business Management has an employee record loaded, so there is no individual layer here — not an empty one, an absent one. Q-18 has not confirmed that an employee master with stable ids exists, or where it lives, and inventing one to fill this panel would make Layer 4 look far closer than it is.

See every department's Layer-4 position →
INTERNAL PROCESS · WHAT WE NEED BACK
  1. Is this what you are accountable for? Delete what is not; add what is missing.
  2. Is the formula right — especially the denominator?
  3. Who is the metric owner and who is the data owner? They must be two different people.
  4. What is the target, and on what basis was it set?
  5. Where does the number come from today — which system, or which spreadsheet?