Operations throughput, Nov–Jan
Re-sequencing the disbursement queue should raise same-day completion without raising double disbursements.
Recorded 2025-10-20, before the window opened on 2025-11-01. A hypothesis written afterwards is a description, and the difference matters when the result is read.
The window mean meets the goal, and no declared guard moved adversely.
Campaign window 2025-11-01 → 2026-01-31 against a baseline of the same length immediately before it, 2025-08-01 → 2025-10-31. The baseline is not chosen — it is derived from the window, so it cannot be picked after the result is known.
| METRIC | BASELINE MEAN | WINDOW MEAN | CHANGE | GOAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maker/checker SLA adherence OP-02 · higher is better | 45.2% 3 pts | 48.0% 3 pts | +2.86pp improved | 47.5% |
| Double-disbursement incidents OP-09 · lower is better · guard | 4,210.1 3 pts | 4,181.6 3 pts | -28.44 improved | — |
- 1 other campaign ran over part of this window: Q1 approval-rate push.
- OP-02 was already moving in this direction BEFORE the campaign began — the baseline itself improved on the period before it. Part of what you are reading is a trend the campaign did not start.
- The window mean is an average of 3 points. One unusual month moves it materially.
- A movement that coincides with a campaign is not a movement caused by it. This platform reports the coincidence and does not attribute it — attribution needs a control group, and there is not one.
The goal of 47.5 is the campaign’s, not the registry’s. OP-02’s target is still whatever the registry says it is, its threshold is unchanged, and closing this campaign wrote nothing to either. R-G-16.