Direct Disbursement Ratio (DDR)CG-01REGULATORY
Balance basis — outstanding ÷ outstanding. Ikigai's reading of Circular 43 Art. 8a(4). ALERTING IS BOUND TO THIS. Awaiting ACF confirmation.
Compare both bases on the compliance panel →Value 66.7 against threshold 30. DDR above the 30% cap under Circular 43 Art. 8a(4). SBV administrative-violation record taken.
Notified: Head of Corporate Governance · Corporate Governance · CEO
- Formula
- direct-disbursement outstanding ÷ total consumer outstanding
- Unit / direction
- pct · lower better
- Source system
- Payment GW / T24
- Refresh
- daily_t1
- Target
- hard 30% — Circular 43 Art. 8a(4); warn at 27%
- Target status
- From an ACF document
- Baseline in context/
- 66.7% (PQR) vs 30% cap
Both proposed by Ikigai and awaiting ACF confirmation (DEC-02).
The question an auditor asks is not “what is the number” but “where did it come from, and who could have changed it on the way”. Nodes outlined in red are blocked — the chain is only as strong as the link nobody can yet evidence, and hiding that would defeat the point of showing lineage at all.
- Head of Corporate Governanceperiod 2026-09 · 22 Sep 2026
Breach sustained. Remediation is the 20M VND cash-loan cap; expect DDR to fall from Q4. Cash loan now at 42% of volume budget but 92% of revenue budget.
- IT System Planningperiod 2026-08 · 24 Aug 2026
Figure keyed from the Payment GW extract by hand. Denominator basis still unconfirmed (DEC-11) — the flow-basis variant CG-01B is published alongside so the gap is visible rather than averaged away.
Commentary is attached to the metric and period, not to a slide. It survives the month — which is what makes a variance reviewable at the next meeting instead of re-argued. Prototype — read-only fixtures; at fullstack this is the COMMENT table with author identity from AD.